|

|
|
PERMACULTURE; ETHICAL DESIGN FOR ABUNDANT LIVING
By Graham Burnett (This article was originally appeared in 'The Raven' Anarchist Quarterly, the 'Food' issue)
It’s become a cliché to say that we are living on the edge of
eco-disaster- it’s also a reality that cannot be overstated. The
ecology of Gaia is an interface between land (the Geosphere), air (the
Atmosphere), water (the Hydrosphere) and life (the Biosphere), a
delicate web of interconnections on the verge of unravelling right
before our eyes.
The global eco-crisis is at least partly a consequence of the way
that we in the West consume- cheap post war food production policies
and a disconnectedness from the world around us have led us to overlook
the true costs of what we eat and drink. In the UK farmers have
increased food production by 100% since the war, yet the farming labour
force is dwindling and the quality of agricultural land is diminishing.
In addition, the energy inputs to achieve that production have
increased 1,600%. In other words, farming is actually about eight times
less efficient now than it was in 1945. Other hidden
consequences of this cheap-at-all-costs/live-now-pay-later ethic
include massive soil erosion, nitrification of the water table, loss of
biodiversity and wildlife habitat, contamination of fruit and
vegetables with pesticide residues and the release of greenhouse gasses
such as methane and carbon dioxide caused by excessive cattle farming
and ploughing. Even the humble cup of tea that you could well be
sipping as you read this very article is a product of a complex chain
of inputs and outputs, few of which are ever fully ethically or
environmentally accounted for...

But it doesn’t have to be this way. Is there any good reason why our
‘cuppa’ can’t be sourced as part of a self reliant and abundant cycling
system? (OK, so ‘tea’ won’t grow well in the Cool Temperate UK, but
there are plenty of substitutes which will, such as lemon balm,
chamomile, mint, dandelion, rosehips, raspberry leaves, nettles, etc)

Permaculture is a contraction of PERMAnent agriCULTURE (or sometimes
PERMAnent CULTURE), a term coined in the late seventies by two
Australians, David Holmgren and Bill Mollison. Like Anarchy, it’s a
concept that is beautifully simple, yet can be notoriously difficult to
explain. One useful soundbite summary is "Creating abundant and
sustainable human habitats by following nature’s patterns". Primarily
permaculture is a design system- a way of making links and connections,
of looking at how elements are placed in relation to each other in
order to maximise their efficiency in creating a self sustaining, low
input/high output, non-exploiting whole.
At the heart of permaculture is a core set of values or ethics.
These can be summarised as ‘Earthcare’ (recognising that our Earth,
Gaia, is the source of all life and respecting her accordingly);
‘Peoplecare’ (supporting and helping each other to change to ways of
living that are not harming ourselves or the planet, and realising that
we are a part of the Earth, not apart from it) and ‘Fairshares’
(ensuring that the Earth's limited resources are utilised in ways that
are equitable and wise).
Permaculture design isn't about is having to get your head around
untold facts, figures, Latin names and complicated techniques, rather
it is about careful and contemplative observation of nature and natural
systems, of recognising universal patterns and principles, and learning
to apply these ‘ecological truisms’ to our own circumstances. These
tools and strategies can be utilised to finding ‘Earthright’ solutions
in all forms of human activity, from energy management, sorting out
efficient transportation systems, ‘Green’ economics and trading
ventures, waste treatment, forestry practice and land development to
promoting holistic health systems and creating sustainable homes and
communities.
However, we all need to eat, and it is the issue of food production
where permaculture has its origins. If we are to feed ourselves
sustainably we clearly need to be moving away from industrialised
agriculture and more towards a gardening philosophy- less high chemical
input prairie farming of monocultures and more market and home gardens;
places for creating edible landscapes, polycultures, community growing
projects and forest gardens. In London alone the potential food growing
space includes 14,411ha of agricultural land, 53,600ha of protected
open space, 1.4 million households with gardens, 1388ha of derelict
land and 980ha of allotments, as well as school playgrounds, rooftops,
parks, balconies, etc (figures- NFA/SAFE Alliance). Not many of us
would be able to grow ALL of the food we need to live, but all of us
could make an often significant contribution to our own diets, and
might even have a surplus to share or trade with friends and
neighbours. Growing our own not only guarantees a supply of fresh,
locally grown high quality produce, but also has many other benefits.
These include stress relief, exercise (I particularly like Bill
Mollison’s description of gardening as a "form of gentle Tai Chi"), a
reconnection with the soil and an excuse to simply lean on the spade
and philosophise the afternoon away.
The ‘pattern language’ of permaculture design principles can be
clearly demonstrated when applied to our productive gardens,
allotments, orchards and smallholdings;
- Work With Nature, Not Against...
Francis Bacon's assertion in the early 1600's that we must 'bend
nature to our will' has informed our species' relationship with this
fragile planet for much of the modern era. Now in these days of
desertification, flooding, global warming, ozone depletion and mass
extinction we are seeing just how futile and plain wrong-headed such a
philosophy truly is. Putting massive efforts into attempting to 'tame
nature', such as by damming valleys and flood plains or creating and
maintaining bare soil by plough, is not only energy consuming,
unsustainable and destructive, it is also unnecessary when we can meet
the needs of people and the environment by working in harmony with, or
even directly utilising, natural systems.
Everything gardens, or modifies it's environment- worms dig and aerate
the land; leaf fall mulches bare soil and adds nutrients and structure;
spreading annuals such as chickweed provide an over wintering ground
cover crop; slugs devour dead plant matter and begin the composting
process which is continued by bacteria and fungi; bees pollinate and
the droppings of birds sew seeds and add fertiliser.
Instead of whipping out the Bug Gun at the first sign of pest damage,
why not encourage predators such as ladybirds and hoverflies to do our
work for us by planting attractants such as limnathes, nigela or
buckwheat? Instead of damaging the soil's structure and straining our
backs with constant digging, why not add compost directly to the soil
as a surface mulch and utilise the worms' free labour inputs, whilst at
the same time suppressing weeds and providing protection from the
elements? - The Problem Is The Solution
Or, in the words of Bill Mollison, "You haven't got an excess of slugs,
you’ve got a duck deficiency…" It is how we look at things that make
them advantageous or not. For example, a ‘weed’ is often described as
any plant that is growing in the wrong place. Yet with a small shift in
perspective we can change our definition to "A plant whose virtues have
not yet been discovered". Nature abhors a vacuum, and any soil that is
left bare will quickly be colonised by native wild plants. Rather than
constantly battling to eradicate these 'volunteers', why not adopt a
more tolerant approach? Although ‘weeds’ can compete with our food
crops, and given half a chance would very quickly return cultivated
land to wilderness, allow some to grow between productive areas. They
increase biodiversity, act as ‘dynamic accumulators’ (that is, they
mine the sub soil with their roots to bring up minerals that may be
deficient on the surface), attract wildlife and can be harvested for
compost or mulch material. Many are even edible or medicinal, or have a
host of other uses and properties our post Victorian/Cramphorns
haughty-culture have largely forgotten... - Maximise Diversity
As we enter the twenty first century the world largely relies on some
twenty or so staple crops. Yet the Cornwall based permaculture growing
and research project Plants For A Future list over seven thousand
species of plants that are edible or otherwise useful to peoplekind
that we can grow in the UK alone.
In a permaculture growing system each function should be supported by
many elements. In other words, nothing should be indispensable as it’s
loss or failure can be disastrous. A person who has had only one well
paid but highly specialised job throughout their working life would be
less able to cope with redundancy than somebody who has several small
incomes earned from a variety of sources. In the same way, the farmer
who grows a wide and diverse range of edible plants as possible (a
polyculture) still gets to eat if some of them don’t make it to
harvest. On the other hand, their neighbour who gives all of their land
over to one crop (a monoculture) starves if it fails.
The other side of the coin is that every element in the system should
have many uses. Permaculture people tend to spend a lot of time
emphasising the importance of planting trees. This is because of the
multiplicity of their yields and functions. Not only do they provide
food crops in the form of fruit, nuts, berries, beans and leaf protein,
they also supply bio-fuels, timber, coppice, medicines and fibre as
well as a myriad of beneficial effects for wildlife and on planet wide
systems. - Everything Cycles
In the natural world, there is no such thing as 'pollution'. Within
an ecosystem, every 'waste product' is useful elsewhere within that
system. Examples include the Nitrogen, Carbon and Hydrological cycles.
Yet industrialised society seems to be all about breaking these
feedback loops. Nowhere perhaps is this more clearly typified than by
our habit of flushing our bodily wastes out to sea every time we pull
the toilet chain. Not only are we causing pollution, we are wasting a
valuable resource. Composting our faeces mends the cycle of fertility,
producing 'humanure' which, after a year or so to ensure that pathogens
are destroyed, can be used as a fertiliser for trees or fruit bushes
rather than crops which are consumed directly such as leaves or salads.
We have also broken the cycle of time by changing to a linear perception of it's passage. For
our ancestors, events were not singular but recurrent, governed by the
movements of sun and moon, the passing of the seasons, of sowing and
harvest, summer abundance and winter scarcity. Nowadays we see no
reason why we shouldn't have spring lamb and fresh strawberries in
December, but even though our calendars might run in straight lines,
our bodies are still attuned to respond to nature's patterns. Christmas
feasting was originally about stocking up with the last of the previous
season's harvest in preparation for the lean months ahead. Yet
goosegrass, one of the first plants to appear the following spring,
acts as a natural tonic when drunk as a tea, flushing out the body
toxins that build up over the winter. Returning to eating what is
locally and seasonally available repairs another cycle and puts us back
in touch again. - Correct Placement
Permaculture design is about maximising the beneficial connections
between elements, in other words, putting things in the right place.
There's not a lot of point in planting 'Cut And Come Again' lettuces on
your allotment two miles away from your house if you only visit it once
a week. When you are knocking up a salad for tea, human nature and the
law of minimum effort dictates that you will pop round to the
greengrocers and buy a lettuce whilst your crop sits running to seed…
Permaculture designers therefore use the concept of 'zones' to help
them decide where things best belong. Zones are numbered from 0 to 5,
and can be thought of as a series of concentric rings moving out from a
centre point, where human activity and need for attention is most
concentrated, to where there is no need for intervention at all. Zone
Zero is the house or home centre. In terms of food production this
might be about using energy efficient cooking and storage methods, or
designing an ergonomic kitchen layout. Zone 1 is your immediate back
garden, the place nearest the house where "the gardener's shadow" most
often falls. This is the place to put crops that require frequent
attention, those 'Cut and Come Again' saladings, herbs, strawberry
plants, espalier trees, seedlings in trays, as well as your greenhouse,
worm compost bin and cold frames. Fruit trees and bushes might be in
zone 2, whilst maincrop vegetables that require weeding and watering on
an occasional basis will be a feature of zone 3 (perhaps that once a
week cycling distance allotment?). Zone 4 is semi-wild, for example
coppice managed woodland used for forage and gathering other wild foods
and timber, whilst zone 5 is the wilderness, where there is no human
intervention apart from the observation of natural eco-systems and
cycles.
Permaculture provides a framework upon which to base Earthright
thinking and practice whatever one’s lifestyle choices or belief
system. To me, however, it’s ethical philosophies and principles sit
well with Anarchist thought, particularly concepts like mutualism,
collective networking, decentralisation, autonomy, and placing an
emphasis on personal responsibility. The other thing that I like about
permaculture is that it asks us to start from where we are now; "at the
end of your nose," as Bill Mollison says. You don’t have to wait until
‘After The Revolution’ to sprout a jar of mung beans on your kitchen
shelf or join your local LETS. Nor do you need to be able to afford to
buy acres of land to plant a windowbox full of herbs or support your
nearest Farmers Market. Starting an organic allotment or planting an
apple tree are tremendously empowering acts, and positive steps towards
creating healthy self-reliant communities. At its essence, permaculture
is about making real that other 'green truism', "Think Globally But Act
Locally". For cliché or not, that is where the future lies if we are to
have one. November 2001
|
|
|